Employee Plans News - Special Edition, July 1, 2008

The IRS published Employee Plans News - Special Edition, July 1, 2008:

Sample Plan Language under Code §409(p) for the Transfer of an ESOP's S Corporation Shares

Code §409(p) was enacted as part of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. It requires that an ESOP holding S corporation stock cannot have a prohibited allocation during a nonallocation year. That is, no portion of plan assets attributable to employer securities may accrue or be allocated for the benefit of a disqualified person. Code §409(p)(3) provides that a nonallocation year occurs when disqualified persons (as defined in §409(p)(4)) own or are deemed to own 50% of the outstanding stock of the S corporation, taking into consideration synthetic equity as defined in Code §409(p)(6)(C) and Regulations §1.409(p)-1(f). During a nonallocation year, prohibited allocations are deemed to be distributed and excise taxes are imposed on the S corporation pursuant to §4979A. Additional consequences of a nonallocation year relate to plan qualification and the tax status of the corporation.

Regulation §1.409(p)-1(b)(v) provides that a nonallocation year may be prevented by transferring assets from the accounts of disqualified persons to the non-ESOP portion of the plan. Sample plan language to provide for such transfers is posted on our web site: www.irs.gov/ep. Under this plan provision, the Plan Administrator calculates the number of shares that need to be transferred in order to prevent the occurrence of a nonallocation year. The employer needs to provide the Plan Administrator all the information needed to perform this calculation, including information on synthetic equity.

Comments on this language should be sent by August 15, 2008. However, this sample language can be used now pending the comment period.

Related Links:

• Sample Plan Language for Section 409(p) Transfers
• Final Regulations (2006) – Final Regulations were issued on December 16, 2006 and generally applicable with respect to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2006.
• Proposed and Temporary Regulations (2004) – Proposed and Temporary Regulations were issued December 16, 2004 and are generally effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2005.
• Proposed and Temporary Regulations (2003) – Proposed and Temporary Regulations were issued July 21, 2003 and are generally applicable with plan years ending after October 20, 2003.
• IRC Section 409(p) - Qualifications for tax credit employee stock ownership plans - Prohibited allocations of securities in an S corporation (2001) – Section 409(p) was added to the code in 2001. For S corporation ESOPs in existence on March 14, 2001, Section 409(p) is effective for plan years beginning after December 31, 2004.
• IRS Announcement 2005-80, 2005-2 I.R.B. 967 – Settlement Initiative – Management S Corporation ESOP Transactions (Transactions where the taxpayer has claimed that it is entitled to exclude income of an operating business by asserting, incorrectly, that the taxpayer had established, on or before March 14, 2001, an employee stock ownership plan entitled to an exemption from unrelated business income and an S corporation that is a management corporation, and whatever actions that were taken to attempt to establish an employee stock ownership plan and a management S corporation were taken on or before March 14, 2001
• IRS Revenue Ruling 2004-4, 2004-6 I.R.B. 414 – Prohibited Allocations of Securities in an S Corporation – Transactions that involve segregating the business profits of an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)-owned S corporation in a qualified subchapter S subsidiary, so that rank-and-file employees do not benefit from participation in the ESOP
• IRS Revenue Ruling 2003-6, 2003-3 I.R.B. 286 – Prohibited Allocations of Securities in an S Corporation – Certain arrangements involving the transfer of ESOPs that hold stock in an S corporation for the purpose of claiming eligibility for the delayed effective date of § 409(p)
  
• IRC Section 409(p) Anti-Abuse Testing, History of Regulations, and Private Letter Ruling (PLR) 200804023
• Missouri Building LLC v. Clark (In re Seferyn), B.A.P. 10th Cir., No. KS-07-094 (May 15, 2008)
• California's Franchise Tax Board (FTB) Notice 2008-4 – Resolution of Certain ESOP Transactions