Showing posts with label IRS Revenue Ruling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IRS Revenue Ruling. Show all posts

Monday, March 7, 2011

IRS Revenue Ruling 2011-7 - Section 403(b) plan termination

Final regulations under section 403(b) of the Code were published in 2007. Under the regulations a section 403(b) plan is permitted to contain provisions that provide for plan termination and that allow accumulated benefits to be distributed on termination. This ruling provides guidance clarifying how the section 403(b) plan termination provisions apply.

Related Links:

Monday, January 24, 2011

Rev. Rul. 2011-3 - 2011 covered compensation tables; permitted disparity

The covered compensation tables under section 401 of the Code for the year 2011 are provided for use in determining contributions to defined benefit plans and permitted disparity.

Related Links:

Monday, January 10, 2011

Rev. Rul. 2011-1

This ruling modifies the rules for group trusts described in Rev. Rul. 81-100, 1981-1 C.B. 326, as clarified and modified by Rev. Rul. 2004-67, 2004-2 C.B. 28. The modifications revise the generally applicable rules for these group trusts and, if certain requirements are met, permit the participation in group trusts of custodial accounts under section 403(b)(7), retirement income accounts under section 403(b)(9), and governmental retiree benefit plans under section 401(a)(24). This ruling also modifies the transition relief provided in Rev. Rul. 2008-40, 2008-2 C.B. 166, relating to plans qualifying under section 1165 of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code (Puerto Rico Code). In addition, this ruling provides related model language that may be used by group trusts to comply with these new provisions. Rev. Ruls. 81-100, 2004-67, and 2008-40 modified.

Related Links:

Monday, November 8, 2010

IRS Revenue Ruling 2010-27 – What constitutes an Unforeseeable Emergency Distribution under section 457(b) of the Code and regulations section 1.457-6(c).

This ruling provides guidance, in the form of examples, on what constitutes an unforeseeable emergency distribution under section 457(b) of the Code and regulations section 1.457-6(c). The ruling also applies the same standards to distributions from a nonqualified deferred compensation plan subject to section 409A.

Related Links:

Monday, January 12, 2009

IRS Revenue Ruling 2009-02 – Permitted disparity in employer-provided contributions or benefits Plans

Part I

Section 401. -- Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plans

26 CFR 1.401(l)-1: Permitted disparity in employer-provided contributions or benefits

IRS Revenue Ruling 2009-02 – Permitted disparity in employer-provided contributions or benefits

2009 covered compensation tables; permitted disparity. The covered compensation tables under section 401 of the Code for the year 2009 are provided for use in determining contributions to defined benefit plans and permitted disparity.

Related Links:

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-45 – Qualified Pension, Profit-sharing, and Stock Bonus Plans

Part I – Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

Section 401. -– Qualified Pension, Profit-sharing, and Stock Bonus Plans

26 CFR 1.401-1: Qualified pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans. (Also, § 414.)

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-45 – Qualified Pension, Profit-sharing, and Stock Bonus Plans

Exclusive benefit rule; transfer of plan sponsorship; controlled groups. This ruling provides that the exclusive benefit rule of section 401(a) of the Code is violated if the sponsorship of a qualified retirement plan is transferred from an employer to an unrelated taxpayer and the transfer is not in connection with a transfer of business assets or operations from the employer to the unrelated taxpayer.

Revenue Ruling 2008-45 considers whether the exclusive benefit rule of § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") is violated if the sponsorship of a qualified retirement plan is transferred from an employer to an unrelated taxpayer and the transfer of the sponsorship of the plan is not in connection with a transfer of business assets, operations, or employees from the employer to the unrelated taxpayer.

ISSUE
Is the exclusive benefit rule of § 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") violated if the sponsorship of a qualified retirement plan is transferred from an employer to an unrelated taxpayer and the transfer of the sponsorship of the plan is not in connection with a transfer of business assets, operations, or employees from the employer to the unrelated taxpayer?

HOLDING
The exclusive benefit rule of § 401(a) is violated if the sponsorship of a qualified retirement plan is transferred from an employer to an unrelated taxpayer and the transfer of the sponsorship of the plan is not in connection with a transfer of business assets, operations, or employees from the employer to the unrelated taxpayer.

This ruling does not address any federal income tax consequences other than those specifically addressed herein.

Related Links:

Thursday, March 6, 2008

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-13 – Excessive Compensation

Part I

Section 162(m)—Excessive Compensation

26 CFR 1.162-27(e)

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-13 – Excessive Compensation

Performance-based compensation. This ruling holds that compensation paid to an executive is not qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code, even if the compensation is paid upon the attainment of the performance goal, if the plan agreement or contract provides for payment of compensation to an executive upon the attainment of a performance goal or for (1) termination without "cause" or for "good reason" or (2) voluntary retirement

Related Links:

Saturday, February 2, 2008

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-07 - Minimum Vesting Standards

Part I

Section 411. – Minimum Vesting Standards

26 CFR 1.411(b)-1: Accrued benefit requirements.

(Also, § 7805; § 301.7805-1.)

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-07 - Minimum Vesting Standards

The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued this revenue ruling to address "the application of the accrual rules for pension plans under section 411(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (commonly referred to as “backloading” rules)."

Does the defined benefit plan described below that was converted from a traditional benefit formula to a lump sum-based benefit formula satisfy the accrual rules of § 411(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) of the Internal Revenue Code for the 2002 plan year?

Accrued benefits; cash balance defined benefit pension plans; section 411 of the Code. This ruling, which pertains to a traditional defined benefit pension plan that is amended in 2001 for the 2002 plan year into a cash balance defined benefit pension plan containing an accrued benefit formula that is a lump sum-based benefit, describes the application of the accrual rules of sections 411(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) of the Code to the fact pattern.

Related Links:

Thursday, December 27, 2007

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-5 - Losses from wash sales of stock or securities

Part I

Section 1091.—Loss from Wash Sales of Stock or Securities

26 CFR 1.1091-1: Losses from wash sales of stock or securities.

IRS Revenue Ruling 2008-5 - Losses from wash sales of stock or securities

If an individual sells stock or securities for a loss and causes his or her individual
retirement account or Roth IRA to purchase substantially identical stock or securities
within 30 days before or after the sale, is the loss on the sale of the stock or securities
disallowed?

Related Links:

Monday, December 10, 2007

IRS Revenue Ruling 2007-71 - Permitted disparity in employer-provided contributions or benefits

Part I

Section 401. -- Qualified Pension, Profit-Sharing, and Stock Bonus Plans

26 CFR 1.401(l)-1: Permitted disparity in employer-provided contributions or benefits

IRS Revenue Ruling 2007-71 - Permitted disparity in employer-provided contributions or benefits

2008 covered compensation tables; permitted disparity. The covered compensation tables under section 401 of the Code for the year 2008 are provided for use in determining contributions to defined benefit plans and permitted disparity.

Related Links: